For the past few weeks, I've grown utterly bored with the whole ID/evolution debate. I'm at the point where I've heard every argument over and over and over, and I still think the Darwinists are living in the Twilight Zone. How they dismiss ID is simply beyond me.
Interestingly enough, Casey Luskin has posted an article that I'd thought about writing myself. If you've had any experience carrying on dialogue about Intelligent Design with a hard core Darwinist, you've no doubt run across every one of their standard lame arguments more than once.
If you have not had the pleasure of debating the issues with our dear Darwin supporters, here is the type of dialogue you have to look forward to.
